For engineering
How the scanner, scenarios, Monte Carlo, policy gate, and CI workflow fit together.
Executive manual
The manual explains the product without hiding the math: Q x R + C + E, estimate class, P90, Blue Book basis, policy gates, and actuals calibration.
Five-page version
The core question remains: can we afford this pull request at P90 after scale?
Every buyer page points back to the same method so the pitch stays crisp instead of becoming a feature dump.
Open the 5-page PDFHow to use the manual
The executive reader should start with the core question: can we afford this pull request at P90 after scale? That frames the product as an approval system, not a dashboard or a developer toy.
The finance reader should follow the formula Q x R + C + E. Quantity is the workload the pull request creates. Rate is the frozen price and capability basis. Contingency is the cost-risk allowance to move from the expected case to the budget case you approve against - here, the P90 minus the expected delta from the paired Monte Carlo, not a flat percentage add-on. Escalation is the future curve driven by price, volume, and structural growth.
The engineering reader should use the code-island framing: scanner, scenario, Monte Carlo, policy, actuals. That keeps implementation details connected to the buyer promise and prevents marketing from drifting away from the repo.
Reader paths
How the scanner, scenarios, Monte Carlo, policy gate, and CI workflow fit together.
How to read P50, P90, P95, contingency, escalation, and estimate class.
What to approve, what to defer, and which controls matter before merge.
Why free comments build adoption while paid enforcement creates the monetization lever.
Deeper context
At the heart of our platform lies a strict adherence to the principles of cost engineering, adapted for the unpredictable nature of Large Language Models. Unlike traditional software where compute costs are deterministic and tied directly to traffic, AI feature costs are highly variable. They depend on model selection, input token length, output token variability, the frequency of retries due to hallucinations or malformed JSON, and dynamic fallback chains.
To capture this complexity, Class1 employs Monte Carlo simulations using Common Random Numbers (CRN). By modeling the system before and after a pull request across thousands of synthetic scenarios, we isolate the true cost delta of your architectural change from background noise. This approach allows us to assign an AACE (Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering) estimate class to the forecast, communicating both the expected cost and the confidence interval.
Furthermore, this estimation does not happen in a vacuum. The Blue Book ledger records historical execution data, creating a closed-loop calibration system. As your team merges changes and actuals are observed in production, the engine updates its actuarial tables. This continuous feedback loop ensures that our pre-merge budget gates remain accurate and actionable, preventing catastrophic cost overruns before they reach production while maintaining developer velocity.